(Or maybe coming up RGR). My research activities on opsin have lately led me to peropsin and RGR. These are opsins in the RGR/Go superfamily (a la Plachetzki et al 2007) [Note Porter et al 2012 named this superfamily Group IV, but I don't like that name as much because it is not clear there are actually four superfamily groups].
Below is a report I sent to the first author of a paper that just came out. The paper is here:
Battelle, B., Kempler, K., Saraf, S., Marten, C., Dugger, D., Speiser, D., & Oakley, T. (2014). Opsins in Limulus eyes: characterization of three visible light-sensitive opsins unique to and co-expressed in median eye photoreceptors and a peropsin/RGR that is expressed in all eyes Journal of Experimental Biology, 218 (3), 466-479 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.116087
Battelle, B., Kempler, K., Saraf, S., Marten, C., Dugger, D., Speiser, D., & Oakley, T. (2014). Opsins in Limulus eyes: characterization of three visible light-sensitive opsins unique to and co-expressed in median eye photoreceptors and a peropsin/RGR that is expressed in all eyes Journal of Experimental Biology, 218 (3), 466-479 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.116087
I've taken to writing reports for collaborations, as it focuses me to get done the work, and to share it with collaborators in a way where they can easily extract information for the publication. Below is such a report that I created for the above-cited paper:
Introduction
In 1997, (Sun et al.
1997) reported a new opsin, found in cDNA libraries of human eyes,
and shown by immunohistochemistry to be expressed in Retinal Pigment
Epithelium. Another name for peropsin is RRH (retinal pigment
epithelium-derived rhodopsin homologue). The most closely related gene to
peropsin in the human genome is RGR (RPE−retinal G protein−coupled receptor),
first discovered in 1993 (Jiang,
Pandey, and Fong 1993). Based on mouse knockout experiments, RGR is
a photoisomerase involved in the generation of 11-cis-retinal (Chen et al. 2001). Both
of these vertebrate genes belong to a large clade of opsins called “RGR/Go” (Plachetzki, Degnan, and Oakley 2007;
Feuda et al. 2012) or “Group-IV” opsins (Porter et al. 2012).
Nagata et al (2010) claimed to find the
first peropsin from a protostome, a jumping spider, Hasarius adansoni. However, their phylogenetic analysis showed only
weak support (77%) for the spider gene as the sister to peropsins and was based
on overly simplistic phylogenetic techniques (neighbor-joining based on an
unspecified distance model). Eriksson et al (2013)
discovered a gene from the spider Cupiennius
salei that is very similar to the jumping spider gene. While their
phylogenetic analysis shows good support for these spider genes in the Group IV
clade (1.0 posterior probability in Bayesian Inference), their placement with
peropsin is again tenuous (0.62). Hering and Mayer (2014) reported a third
chelicerate peropsin-like gene from the genome of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae. The three
chelicerate genes form a well-supported clade within Group IV opsins, but their
phylogenetic position was again uncertain with respect to peropsin and RGR. In
some analysis of Hering and Mayer (2014), the chelicerate
genes are weakly supported as sister to all other RGR and peropsin genes and in
one analysis they are weakly supported as sister to RGR.
Methods
I conducted phylogenetic analyses on 30 opsin sequences,
including our putative Limulus peropsin/RGR-like gene, 27 genes of the
RGR/peropsin (=RPE/peropsin) clade of Hering and Mayer (2014), plus two outgroup
opsins with solved crystal structures (Bos
taurus c-opsin (Palczewski
et al. 2000) and Todarodes r-opsin
(Murakami and Kouyama 2008)).
I conducted all phylogenetic analyses using the Osiris phylogenetics package (Oakley et al. 2014)
within Galaxy (Blankenberg et al. 2005). I first aligned all
30 sequences using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004). I next used RAxML version 7.4 (Stamatakis
2006), assuming a GTR+G model to search for the Maximum Likelihood
phylogeny, and conducted 100 bootstrap pseudoreplications to gauge node
stability.
Results
The new Limulus peropsin/RGR-like
gene forms a clade with the three “peropsins” previously described from
chelicerates (100%), and is sister to the two spider “peropsins” (93%). The
relationships within chelicerates are not consistent with taxonomy, which would
predict that Limulus, as the only
non-arachnid, should fall as the sister gene to the other three chelicerate
genes. Our results are similar to previous analyses that cannot confidently
place the chelicerate genes in a specific position between RGR and peropsin.
Discussion
We found a gene in Limulus
that is very similar to other chelicerate genes known in the literature as
protostome “peropsins”. However, a careful examination of previous studes, and
our own results, indicate that the chelicerate genes may orthologs of peropsins
or RGR genes, or that vertebrate RGR and peropsins are in paralogs compared to
the chelicerate genes. The inability of phylogenetic analyses to unequivocally
place the chelicerate genes could be caused by sparse sampling of invertebrate
genomes. In addition, many of the peropsin/RGR sequences found in invertebrate
full genome sequences have not been experimentally verified, nor has function
been demonstrated for them. Clearly, there is much to learn about this clade of
opsins.
References
Chen, P, W
Hao, L Rife, X P Wang, D Shen, J Chen, T Ogden, et al. 2001. “A Photic Visual
Cycle of Rhodopsin Regeneration Is Dependent on Rgr.” Nature
Genetics 28 (3):
256–60.
Eriksson, Bo
Joakim, David Fredman, Gerhard Steiner, and Axel Schmid. 2013.
“Characterisation and Localisation of the Opsin Protein Repertoire in the Brain
and Retinas of a Spider and an Onychophoran.” BMC
Evolutionary Biology 13
(September): 186.
Feuda,
Roberto, Sinead C Hamilton, James O McInerney, and Davide Pisani. 2012.
“Metazoan Opsin Evolution Reveals a Simple Route to Animal Vision.” Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (46): 18868–72.
Hering, Lars,
and Georg Mayer. 2014. “Analysis of the Opsin Repertoire in the Tardigrade
Hypsibius Dujardini Provides Insights into the Evolution of Opsin Genes in
Panarthropoda.” Genome Biology and Evolution, September. doi:10.1093/gbe/evu193.
Jiang, M, S
Pandey, and H K Fong. 1993. “An Opsin Homologue in the Retina and Pigment
Epithelium.” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 34 (13): 3669–78.
Murakami,
Midori, and Tsutomu Kouyama. 2008. “Crystal Structure of Squid Rhodopsin.” Nature 453 (7193): 363–67.
Nagata,
Takashi, Mitsumasa Koyanagi, Hisao Tsukamoto, and Akihisa Terakita. 2010.
“Identification and Characterization of a Protostome Homologue of Peropsin from
a Jumping Spider.” Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology,
Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 196 (1): 51–59.
Oakley, Todd
H, Markos A Alexandrou, Roger Ngo, M Sabrina Pankey, Celia K C Churchill,
William Chen, and Karl B Lopker. 2014. “Osiris: Accessible and Reproducible
Phylogenetic and Phylogenomic Analyses within the Galaxy Workflow Management
System.” BMC Bioinformatics 15 (July): 230.
Palczewski,
K, T Kumasaka, T Hori, C A Behnke, H Motoshima, B A Fox, I Le Trong, et al.
2000. “Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G Protein-Coupled Receptor.” Science 289 (5480): 739–45.
Plachetzki,
David C, Bernard M Degnan, and Todd H Oakley. 2007. “The Origins of Novel
Protein Interactions during Animal Opsin Evolution.” PloS One 2 (10): e1054.
Porter, Megan
L, Joseph R Blasic, Michael J Bok, Evan G Cameron, Thomas Pringle, Thomas W
Cronin, and Phyllis R Robinson. 2012. “Shedding New Light on Opsin Evolution.” Proceedings.
Biological Sciences / The Royal Society 279 (1726): 3–14.